The Aesthetics of ‘Speaking Objects’ in Aniki-Bóbó’s Anthropo-cosmo-morphic Material

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14591/aniki.v8n2.780

Palabras clave:

Filmic surfaces, material culture, antropo-cosmo-morphism, transitional objects, filmic re-signification, intellectual montage

Resumen

The surface of the things which make up the pro-filmic constitutes the shell/ signifier chosen to shape the soul of the filmic world or its anthropo-cosmo-morphic image rendered by the techniques of film language. The result is the creation of a complex and multi-layered “possible world”, consisting of discursive parts that speak through the dramaturgy and aesthetics of the film, a socio-semantics which transfigures the matter of bodies and objects through the mechanisms of filmic re-signification. Amongst these, the intellectual montage as well as all the graphic and audio signs that appear on the scene can be identified. These signs stand out because of their metaphorical-discursive capacity, as will be analysed in the film Aniki-Bóbó (1942) by Manoel de Oliveira: the written words that serve to give voice to inanimate matter (Carlitos’ bag); the modelled forms which reproduce material allegories or doubles of the human body (the doll); the fragile materials that refer to the children’s fragility itself; the steel and iron of mechanised infrastructures showing the modernisation of the country; the classical architecture, the nature of the place and the free, open-air spaces of games, as opposed to closed spaces that recall underdeveloped pedagogical institutions; and among the latter, the liminal place par excellence, symbolised by the ‘Shop of Temptations’. In the filmic whole, bodies, places and objects are thus configured as interconnected parts of a single compact world, in which the cosmos is reflected in the anthropo, and the anthropo in the cosmos, in order to transfigure, in a metaphorical key, the immaterial culture referring to the changes in national identity. This allegorical fable of Portuguese pedagogical culture ultimately proposes the possibility of a social (and political) change, projected into a ‘just’ future without dictatorship (victory of good over evil).

Citas

Barthes, Roland. 1982. L’Obvie et l’Obtus. Essais critiques III. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

Bruno, Giuliana. 2014. Surface: Matters of Aesthetics, Materiality, and Media. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Carluccio, Giulia Anastasia, Morreale, Emiliano, and Pierini, Maria Paola (eds). 2017. Intorno al Neorealismo. Voci, contesti, linguaggi e culture dell'Italia del dopoguerra. Milano: Scalpendi.

Costa, João Bénard da. 1981. “Diálogo com Manoel de Oliveira”. In Manoel de Oliveira, 31-46. Lisboa: Cinemateca Portuguesa.

_______. 2004. Aniki-Bobo. Accessed April 25 2021. http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/aniki-bobo_%28Enciclopedia-del-Cinema%29/.

Cruchinho, Fausto. 2008a. “The Woman in the Shop Window and the Man looking at Her: The Politics of the Look in Manoel de Oliveira’s Ouvre”. In On Manoel de Oliveira, edited by Carolin Overhoff Ferreira, 49-59. London: Wallflower Press.

_______, 2008b. “Vai-e-Vem, os dois movimentos de João César Monteiro”. Estudos do Século XX 8: 149-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.14195/1647-8622_8_10

Eisenstein, Sergei. 1949. Film Form: Essays in Film Theory, edited and translated by Jay Leyda. New York: Harcourt.

Ferreira, Carolin Overhoff. (2010). “Portugal, Europa e o mundo: Condição humana e geopolítica na filmografia de Manoel de Oliveira”. Revista do Centro de Estudos Portugueses 30 (43): 109-140.

Király, Hajnal. 2018. “An Uncanny Cinema, a Cinema of the Uncanny. The Trope of the Doll in the Films of Manoel de Oliveira”. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Film and Media Studies, 15 (1): 33-51. https://doi.org/10.1515/ausfm-2018-0002

Lavin, Mathias. 2008. La Parole le lieu. Le cinema selon Manoel de Oliveira. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.

Lima, Frederico and Tavares, Paula. 2016. “Cinema, Mirrors and Kaleidoscopes: Infancy, sweetness, oblivion and fear”. Tempo-Revista do Departamento de História da UFF 22 (40): 283–302. https://doi.org/10.20509/TEM-1980-542X2016v224003

Lopes, João. 1981. “A Boneca na Montra”. In Manoel de Oliveira, 57-59. Lisboa: Cinemateca Portuguesa.

Morin, Edgar. 2020 [1956]. Le Cinéma ou l'homme imaginaire: Essai d'anthropologie. Paris: Minuit.

Oliveira, Manoel, and Peña, Richard. 1983. “Interview with Manoel de Oliveira”. Journal of the University Film and Video Association 35 (3): 7-14. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20686953?seq=1

Pina Manuel, António. 2012. Aniki-Bóbó. Lisboa: Assírio & Alvim.

Pitassio F. 2019. Neorealist Film Culture 1945-1954: Roma, Open Cinema. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Ribeiro, Felix. 1983. Filmes, Figuras e Factos da História do Cinema Português: 1986-1949. Lisboa: Cinemateca Portuguesa.

Roberti, Bruno. 2012. Manoel De Oliveira. Il visibile dell'invisibile. Roma: Fondazione Ente dello Spettacolo.

Sadoul, Georges. 1972. Dictionary of Films. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Stein, Elliot, Oliveira, Manoel de, Clarens, Carlos and Forman, Emil. 1981. “Manoel de Oliveira and ‘Doomed Love’”. Film Comment 17 (3): 64-68.

Van Gennep, Arnold. 1964 [1909]. The Rites of Passage. Chicago: University of Chicago.

Wagstaff, Christopher. 2007. Italian Neorealist Cinema: An aesthetic approach. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Winnicott, Donald. 1971. Playing and Reality. London: Routledge.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. New York: McMillan.

Descargas

Publicado

2021-07-12