Materiality and Materialism in Robert Kramer and Philip Spinelli’s Scenes from the Class Struggle in Portugal (1977-79)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14591/aniki.v8n2.791

Keywords:

Robert Kramer, political cinema, revolutionary cinema, revolution and cinema, materiality and materialism in cinema, Jean-Paul Fargier, Portuguese Revolution (1974-75)

Abstract

Robert Kramer and Philip Spinelli's Scenes from the Class Struggle in Portugal (1977-79) is one of the major films about the Portuguese Revolution of 1974-75. If Kramer’s filmography anticipates and participates in the self-referential turn of militant and engaged cinema in the sixties and seventies, Scenes from the Class Struggle, a North-American film production, fully integrates the history of Portuguese cinema, as it interweaves a critical, analytical, materialistic and dialectical representation of the Revolution with a formal and material proposal that is in line with the main trends of Portuguese revolutionary cinema, particularly concerning the tension between political engagement and formal experimentation of a significant part of its corpus. This paper seeks to inquire how Kramer and Spinelli’s film addresses issues related to materiality and materialism in cinema. With these factors in place, Scenes from the Class Struggle not only focuses on the Revolution of 1974-75 and its cinematic figurations, but also critically and actively questions the possibility of representing a revolutionary process in cinema and the possibility of representation itself. Firstly, the article briefly retraces the film’s complex material history. Secondly, it argues that it is part of a materialistic and dialectical cinema, following Jean-Paul Fargier’s conceptions, taken up by Dominique Noguez: it is a film that does not seek to reflect ‘reality,’ nor to produce an impression of reality, but that, pondering its filmic materiality and the materiality of the world, reveals this double materiality in one movement, through self-reflexive and self-referential strategies.

References

Agamben, Giorgio. 2007. Qu’est-ce qu’un dispositif?. Paris: Rivages Poche / Petite Bibliothèque.

Althusser, Louis. 1973. Pour Marx. Paris: Maspero.

Baudry, Jean-Louis. 1970. “Cinéma: Effets idéologiques produits par l’appareil de base.” Cinéthique 7-8 (Março): 1-8.

Bazin, André. 1981. Qu’est-ce que le cinéma?. Paris: Cerf.

Benjamin, Walter. 2003. “L’auteur comme producteur.” Em Walter Benjamin, Essais sur Brecht, 122-144. Paris : La Fabrique Éditions.

_______. 2007. “Über den Begriff der Geschichte.” Em Walter Benjamin, Erzählen: Schriftenzur Theorie der Narration und zur literarischen Prosa, 129-140. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Bellour, Raymond. 1988. “Autoportraits.” Communications 48: 327-387. https://doi.org/10.3406/comm.1988.1731

Brenez, Nicole. 2017. “Edouard de Laurot et (le) Cinéma Engagé. Remarques préalables.” Em 36 Short Stories, editado por Mélanie Bouteloup, 107-116. Paris: Bétonsalon.

Bürger, Peter. 2013. Théorie de l’avant-garde. Paris: Saggio Casino.

Comolli, Jean-Louis. 1971-72. “Technique et Idéologie. Caméra, Perspective, Profondeur de Champ.” Cahiers du Cinéma 229-241.

Delahaye, Michel. 1968. “La maisonbrûle. Entretien avec Robert Kramer.” Cahiers du Cinéma 205: 48-63.

Derrida, Jacques. 1995. Mal d’archive. Paris: Galilée.

Dias Branco, Sérgio. 2020. O Trabalho das Imagens – Estudos sobre Cinema e Marxismo. Lisboa: Página a Página.

Fargier, Jean-Paul. 1969. “La parenthèse et le détour.” Cinéthique 5 (setembro-outubro): 15-21.

Gitlin, Laurie e Kramer, Robert. 1976. With Freedom in Their Eyes: A Photo-Essay of Angola. São Francisco: People’s Press.

Gramsci, Antonio. 2012. Guerre de mouvement et guerre de position. Paris: La Fabrique.

Jauss, H. R.. 2013. Pour une esthétique de la réception. Paris: Gallimard.

Kramer, Robert. 2007. Brochura da edição DVD de Cités de la plaine. Paris: les films du paradoxe.

Krauss, Rosalind. 1985. The Originality of Avant-Garde and Other Modernist Myths. Cambridge e Londres: MIT Press.

Lénine. 2012. L’État et la révolution. Paris: La Fabrique.

Marx, Karl. 1977. Le Capital: critique de l’économie politique, 3. Paris: Éditions Sociales.

Marx, Karl e Engels, Friedrich. 1983. Manifeste du Parti communiste. Paris: Champ Libre.

Metz, Christian. 2002. Essais sur la signification au cinéma. Paris: Klincksieck.

Mulvey, Laura. 1975. “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” Screen 16 (3): 6-18.

Noguez, Dominique. 1987. Le cinéma, autrement. Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf.

Rancière, Jacques. 2008. Le spectateur émancipé. Paris: La Fabrique Éditions.

_______. 2004. Malaise dans l’esthétique. Paris: Galilée.

Rimbaud, Arthur. 1988. Lettres du voyant. Paris: La Différence.

Schefer, Raquel. 2017. “The Return of the Newsreel (2011-2016) in Contemporary Cinematic Representations of the Political Event.” Comparat/ive Cinema 9: 61-70.

Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1994. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” Em Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory: A Reader, editado por Patrick Williams e Laura Chrisman, 66-111. Heartfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Published

2021-07-12